Skip to content

NHL Officiating: When the Black and White make a game too grey

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Tonight’s Flyers-Capitals game featured the most ridiculous display of officiating ineptitude I have ever witnessed in person.

After such a statement, you could call me a homer. That would be true, if I didn’t believe that the Flyers lost this game because they could not manage to capitalize on a single power play opportunity.

You could say that I’m just blaming the officials for a Flyers’ loss. But please remember that I consistently maintain that you don’t lose because of bad officiating; you win in spite of it.

Or you could say that the four NHL officials botched a series of calls, reducing the integrity of what promised to be a highly entertaining contest.

The Flyers managed to avoid penalties for several hacking and whacking violations throughout the first two periods. The Capitals’ Mike Green should have received a hooking penalty on the Gagne breakaway. Why the referees opted to assess an intereference penalty on Backstrom with less than five minutes remaining is beyond me. That play is ignored 99% of the time in the current NHL.

And that’s all without addressing the bizarre “incidental contact” which disallowed a Capitals goal but failed to elicit a Flyers power play. Without having seen a true replay (I was at the arena, screaming angrily at the refs), I won’t try to analyze the play. For now, however, I can direct you to the official NHL rules on goaltender contact. Allow me to point out that, other than direct intentional contact between a skater and a netminder, referees are given permission to use discretion in meting out judgment. Given the excellent decision-making they displayed throughout the rest of the evening . . .

Sarcasm aside, I was sad to see this game devolve into an officiating debaucle. Both teams played solid hockey tonight, from the beautiful offensive rushes to crisp puck movement to gutsy defensive desperation. I thoroughly enjoyed the game’s pace and intensity, and I wish we could have seen a more fairly managed bout for this last meeting of the regular season. I’m disappointed that I left my game confused by referees rather than amazed by the sheer talent of both teams.

5 Comments leave one →
  1. Andrew permalink
    Saturday, March 14, 2009 9:25 am

    What I saw on the goalie interference was Nylander losing his balance and tumbling onto Biron after receiving a soft check from a Flyers defenseman.

  2. Saturday, March 14, 2009 12:03 pm

    What made that call odd, though, was that the refs declared it a no-goal due to incidental contact with the goaltender, but there was no penalty. To my mind, either it’s a fair play and a fair goal, or it’s a penalized play and no-goal. I’ve been watching hockey my entire life, and three days later, I still can’t figure these calls out.

  3. John permalink
    Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:13 pm

    Maybe the Flyers-Caps officiating crew had gotten some pointers from NFL and/or NBA refs prior to the game?

  4. Jim Currie permalink
    Saturday, November 28, 2009 9:20 pm

    You think that was bad officiating, I wonder what you think of tonights game, Washington Caps at Montreal. If ever there is a question of home bios, this was the prime example. I don’t know if gambling is playing a role in some of these decisions but it certainly is not fair officiating, in my opinion.
    Sincerely, Jim Currie.


  1. NHL Officiating: When the Black and White make a game too grey | Flyers Fan Central

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: