Skip to content

Moment of Truth for John Stevens

Thursday, November 13, 2008

John Stevens, coach of the Philadelphia FlyersYou can’t deny that John Steven’s temporary demotion of Joffrey Lupul to the fourth line and third period benching of Scott Hartnell has driven conversation among the journalists and bloggers. Both Sam Cachidi of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Ed Moran of the Philadelphia Daily News penned stories on the topic. Blogging heads Tim Panaccio of and Bill Meltzer of followed suit. It also caught the attention of The 700 Level and a few passing words from WE HATE TO LOSE.

Here’s the bottom line: John Stevens is an NHL coach. His entire job is to manage and motivate the players as he see fits to generate the maximum number of victories possible. He is not the first coach to shuffle the lines or bench a player, and he will not be the last. He utilized a few tricks from the bag, and it resulted in 2 points for his club. That’s good coaching.

This story mattered because this was the first time John Stevens pulled those tricks at the NHL level. But the bigger tale here is that demotions and benching only matter if the results extend beyond one game. Sure, the Philadelphia Flyers defeated the New York Islanders. One quick comparison of the rosters will tell you that is but a small feat. It hardly represents a step on the mountain the Flyers have yet to climb.

Tonight the Flyers enter the Mellon Arena with something to prove. Are they an unmotivated, lackluster squad who only play to their potential for brief spans of time and the occasional game against a weaker rival? Or can they rise to the occasion with a team-wide sustained effort—and reproduce that effort regularly?

The difference between those two teams is the difference between good coaching and great coaching. This is where we see what John Stevens is really made of.

9 Comments leave one →
  1. John permalink
    Friday, November 14, 2008 8:02 pm

    Wow, that took long! Melrose is out already…

  2. Friday, November 14, 2008 8:23 pm

    So sad, really. We should have a moment of silence or something.

  3. John permalink
    Friday, November 14, 2008 8:27 pm

    Um.. Is the moment up yet? Because now ESPN can go back to having an amazing /two/ NHL analysts again! 😉

  4. Friday, November 14, 2008 8:32 pm

    Hey, just because I said a moment of silence doesn’t mean we need to start throwing around the compliments. ESPN still only has one analyst.

  5. John permalink
    Friday, November 14, 2008 8:57 pm

    D*mn, I was holding out hope there!

  6. Friday, November 14, 2008 9:00 pm

    Well, there’s always Versus . . .

  7. Friday, November 14, 2008 9:23 pm

    I’m out for the evening – celebrating the new Melrose-free world!

  8. John permalink
    Friday, November 14, 2008 9:24 pm

    You mean the network that was blacking out the Playoffs last year? 🙂

  9. Saturday, November 15, 2008 11:32 pm

    I have the ESPN hockey poll as one of my widgets on iGoogle. Their current poll asks whether you would prefer Melrose coaching in the NHL or analyzing games on TV. First of all, I’m upset that there’s no option for Neither. Secondly, 79% of those who took the poll would rather see him on TV. Really? Cause then you have to listen to him talk. I’d rather watch his system fail miserably.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: